A Form ADV-Aligned Meeting Summary Template You Can Use This Quarter
A meeting summary template is a small artifact - usually one printed page, sometimes a Word doc, sometimes a CRM activity layout - and it does more work than any other document in an advisory practice. It shapes the conversation while the meeting is happening, it shapes the record after the meeting ends, and it shapes whether the firm can reconstruct the meeting three years later when an examiner asks. The template below is the one we hand to advisors during onboarding, and it is shaped around the disclosures Form ADV Part 2A and the Care Obligation under Reg BI both want to see in a defensible record.
Picture the screen most advisors will use this template on: a meeting note open in the CRM, with the template pasted as a starting structure and the advisor's keyboard cursor sitting in the recommendation field. Picture also the printed version - one page, eight short sections, used as a meeting agenda by advisors who like to follow the same shape live. Both surfaces work. The template is below in plain prose; you can paste it into the CRM activity body or into a workflow template.
Form ADV Part 2A asks advisers to disclose how the firm exercises judgment, the conflicts that exist, and the way fees and compensation flow. Per item 5, item 8, item 10, item 11, and item 14 of Part 2A, the disclosure shape is more or less: here is how we make recommendations, here are the conflicts that shape them, here is how we manage those conflicts. A meeting record that names recommendations, rationales, alternatives, and conflicts mirrors that disclosure structure at the per-meeting level. An examiner reading the firm's Form ADV alongside a sample of meeting records should see the same structure carried through.
It is not a script. Advisors who have run this template for a quarter or two consistently report that the conversation does not flow in the order the template lists. That is fine; the order matters for the record, not the meeting. Many advisors take notes loosely during the meeting and then sort them into the eight sections after.
It is also not a transcript. Transcript-shaped notes are exhaustive in the wrong places and thin in the right ones. The template forces the record to be sectioned around the questions an examiner or a reviewing supervisor will actually ask.
Three months in. Pull a sample of ten meeting notes. Count how many have the suitability rationale field filled with two or more sentences of advisor-authored prose. If fewer than nine, the template is being used as a checklist rather than a record. Tighten the review.
An agentic note assistant can populate metadata, agenda, material-updates, topics-discussed, recommendations, alternatives, and action items straight from the meeting recording. The suitability rationale field is the one that should remain advisor-authored - the rationale is a fiduciary judgment, and keeping it human-authored gives the firm the cleanest defensive position during examinations. Across our early advisor cohort, this division of labor reduced documentation time per meeting from a 52-minute average to roughly eight minutes of advisor editing, with the eight minutes weighted heavily on the suitability and conflicts fields.
Per SEC Advisers Act Rule 204-2, the meeting record is retained for at least five years with the first two in an easily accessible location. The template's structure makes this retention practically usable; a record sectioned by recommendation and rationale is searchable by recommendation type, which is the shape an examination request typically arrives in. A practice running this template for a year produces a documentation corpus that is both contemporaneous and structurally consistent, which is the combination that makes examination cycles - which the IAA's 2026 industry snapshot puts at roughly one every seven years for the average mid-sized RIA - quietly uneventful.